Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

September 25, 2018
2018-6126

US Treasury and IRS propose removing Section 385 documentation requirements

The United States (US) Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have issued proposed regulations (REG-130244-17) under Internal Revenue Code1 Section 385 that would remove the minimum documentation requirements that must be satisfied to treat certain financial arrangements among related parties as indebtedness for federal tax purposes (the Documentation Regulations). The Documentation Regulations were issued in final and temporary regulations published in October 2016.

Background

The Documentation Regulations were initially issued in proposed form as part of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in April 2016 (REG-108060-15) and set forth the threshold level of documentation necessary to avoid per se recharacterization as equity (subject to limited exceptions). The requirements under the Documentation Regulations include a binding obligation to repay the funds advanced, a provision of standard creditor's rights, an initial analysis of the borrower's credit, and, if an event of default was waived, an explanation of why a diligent third-party creditor might decide to do so. Satisfaction of the Documentation Regulations would not guarantee that the obligation would be respected as debt for tax purposes. The obligation would still have to be tested under the common-law rules for distinguishing debt and equity.

The Document Regulations were published in temporary and final form (T.D. 9790).2 In finalized form, the Documentation Regulations applied to financial interests issued (or deemed issued) on or after 1 January 2018.3

In Executive Order 13789, issued on 21 April 2017, the Treasury Department was called upon to review all "significant tax regulations" issued on or after 1 January 2016, and to identify those regulations deemed to impose undue financial burden, add undue complexity or exceed statutory authority.

In Notice 2017-38, released in July 2017, the IRS identified the Documentation Regulations as among eight regulation packages requiring additional review. Shortly thereafter, Notice 2017-36 announced the delayed application of the Documentation Regulations by 12 months – making them applicable only to financial arrangements issued on or after 1 January 2019.4 Treasury subsequently announced, in October 2017, its intention to revoke the Documentation Regulations and develop new simplified rules.5

Removal of Documentation Regulations

The new proposed regulations would remove the Documentation Regulations and make corresponding conforming amendments, but do not include new modified rules. The Preamble to the proposed regulations states that Treasury and the IRS will continue to consider whether to develop and issue a modified, simplified version of the minimum documentation requirements to be met to characterize related-party financial interests as debt. It adds that any such regulations would have a prospective effective date and would allow taxpayers sufficient time to comply.

As a formal matter, the regulations removing the Documentation Regulations are proposed to be effective when final regulations are published. However, until that date, taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations to treat the Documentation Regulations as though they had been withdrawn.

Implications

The removal of the Documentation Regulations will surely be welcomed by many taxpayers, because they were generally perceived as overturning decades of long-standing principles developed by case law and settled expectations as to the facts-and-circumstances analysis applied to determine whether financial interests should be characterized as debt or equity under Section 385.

Treasury's intent underlying promulgation of the Documentation Regulations was to impose discipline on related parties by requiring timely documentation and financial support, which met four factors, similar to the documentation and support created when debt is issued to third parties. Accordingly, notwithstanding revocation of the rules, a best practice approach for taxpayers would be to prepare similar loan documentation and economic analysis (e.g., cash flow projections, financial statements, relevant financial ratios), supporting the classification of related-party financial interests as indebtedness. The Documentation Regulations also should serve as a warning not to ignore events of default without documenting why a reasonable creditor would have waived an event of default.

Additionally, the Recharacterization Rules under Section 385 remain in effect as to related-party debt issued in connection with certain targeted transactions and their applicability should still be considered in connection with new issuances of related-party debt.

———————————————
ENDNOTES

1 All "Section" references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

2 See EY Global Tax Alert, Final and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow the scope of earlier proposed regulations, dated 19 October 2016.

3 The final and temporary regulations under Section 385 included the Documentation Regulations described herein, and rules that treat as stock certain debt issued by a corporation to a controlling shareholder in, or to fund, a distribution, or issued in, or funding, another related-party transaction that achieves an economically similar result. See Treas. Reg. Section 1.385-3 (the Recharacterization Rules).

4 See EY Global Tax Alert, US IRS delays Section 385 debt-equity documentation requirements by one year, dated 7 August 2017.

5 See EY Global Tax Alert, US Treasury releases report on reducing regulatory tax burdens, dated 5 October 2017.

———————————————
CONTACTS

For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

Ernst & Young LLP, International Tax Services — Capital Markets Tax Practice

  • David Golden, Washington DC
    david.golden@ey.com
  • Lee Holt, New York
    lee.holt@ey.com
  • Michael Yaghmour, Washington DC
    michael.yaghmour@ey.com
  • Richard Larkins, Washington DC
    richard.larkins@ey.com
  • Matthew Stevens, Washington DC
    matthew.stevens@ey.com
  • Lena Hines, Los Angeles
    lena.hines@ey.com
  • Tyler Arbogast, Washington DC
    tyler.arbogast@ey.com

Ernst & Young LLP, International Tax Services — Financial Services Office

  • Matthew S. Blum, Boston
    matt.blum@ey.com

———————————————
ATTACHMENT

PDF version of this Tax Alert

 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.

 


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or ey.com. Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.


Yes, I accept         Find out more