globaltaxnews.ey.comSign up for tax alert emailsForwardPrintDownload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 November 2018 Australian Taxation Office releases draft update on guidance regarding transfer pricing risk for certain offshore shipping service hub arrangements On 8 November 2018, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released a draft update to Practical Compliance Guideline (the PCG) 2017/1 (effective 1 January 2017) in the form of a new draft Schedule 3 and Attachment C. The PCG sets forth the ATO’s compliance approach to transfer pricing issues related to the location and relocation of certain business activities and operating risks into a centralized operating model, commonly referred to as “hubs.” The risk assessment framework included in new Schedule 3 and Attachment C for certain types of offshore shipping service hub arrangements indicates that taxpayers generally exit the green zone when hub profits exceed a 25% mark-up of hub costs. The PCG, combined with the new draft Schedule 3 and Attachment C addressing the transfer pricing risks for certain types of offshore shipping service hub arrangements, is designed to:
It is important to note that the PCG is not a formal technical analysis of the Australian transfer pricing law, nor its requirements or what is supportable under the law. The draft Schedule 3, when finalized, will be effective for income tax years commencing on or after 1 January 2019. The risk indicators in Schedule 3 are only relevant to shipping or shipping services provided by an offshore shipping service hub for the following natural resource commodities or products:
Offshore shipping service hub definedFor the purposes of this Schedule, an offshore entity will be an offshore shipping service hub if it:
De minimis threshold – combined low risk benchmark
Where the entity does not meet the de minimis threshold, the standard low risk benchmark for the offshore shipping service hub (as well as the low risk benchmark for the marketing hub) will need to be applied. The PCG includes a risk assessment framework in Attachments A, B and new C for categorizing taxpayers through risk ratings. ATO compliance enforcement depends on the hub’s risk rating - with a low engagement for a low risk zone, consequently followed by a detailed and comprehensive review for higher risk hubs. The risk assessment framework indicates the risk rating of taxpayers would increase beyond the green zone (low risk) for:
The tax impact thresholds are different in the risk assessment frameworks for offshore marketing hubs and offshore non-core procurement hubs:
Again, this is not a technical analysis by the ATO of the transfer pricing law or its requirements. The language is related to the often-used ATO analogy of “swimming between the flags.” The takeaway from PCG 2017/1 is that taxpayers who swim outside the green zone should have their flotation devices ready, in the form of transfer pricing documentation, to support the basis for their pricing and profitability decisions. Ernst & Young (Australia), Sydney
Ernst & Young (Australia), Perth
Ernst & Young (Australia), Brisbane
Ernst & Young (Australia), Melbourne
Ernst & Young LLP, Australian Tax Desk, New York
Document ID: 2018-6352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||