globaltaxnews.ey.comSign up for tax alert emailsForwardPrintDownload |
11 January 2019 Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department discusses Hong Kong certificate of residence issues Hong Kong’s Inland Revenue Department (IRD) discussed its view1 on the following issues during its 2018 annual meeting with the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA): (i) The factors considered in determining whether a taxpayer is the beneficial owner in processing an application for a certificate of residence (CoR). (iii) The requirements for CoR application for subsequent years after a CoR has been issued for certain year. (iv) The procedures required for seeking a higher second-level review for CoR applications initially rejected. In deciding whether a CoR can be issued, the IRD would consider whether an applicant is the beneficial owner of the income.
CoR of permanent resident individualIn current practice, if an applicant satisfies the Hong Kong temporary resident requirement,2 the IRD would simply issue a CoR showing only the temporary residence in Hong Kong, even though the applicant may also qualify as a permanent resident of Hong Kong. However, under the tax law in China, taxpayers may not be able to obtain the tax benefits under the tax treaty between China and Hong Kong if they are not able to demonstrate that they are a permanent resident of Hong Kong. Under the circumstances in which individuals clearly indicate in their applications that they are applying for a CoR showing that they are permanent resident, the IRD may issue a CoR indicating the applicant’s permanent residency status by taking into consideration the period of the physical presence of the individual in Hong Kong and all the other facts and circumstances during the given taxable year (e.g., whether the individuals habitually and normally resided in Hong Kong, where their family members habitually lived, whether they had any social and economic ties with Hong Kong, etc.). Under the current administrative arrangement agreed between the IRD and the Chinese Tax Authority, a CoR will generally serve as proof of the Hong Kong residence of a taxpayer for three years. Accordingly, the IRD would not generally accept an applicant’s request for a CoR for the third year. However, if Hong Kong resident taxpayers encounter difficulties in claiming treaty benefits and are specifically requested to submit a CoR for the third year by the Chinese Tax Authority, the applicants could elaborate in their CoR application the reasons and circumstances for requiring a CoR for the third year. The IRD would consider the facts and circumstances of each individual case to see if the application should be accepted. In response to the concerns raised by the HKICPA, the IRD agreed that an applicant could take the following steps to pursue an application for a CoR that had initially been rejected:
2. Under the tax treaty between China and Hong Kong, an individual would qualify as a temporary resident if such individual stays in Hong Kong for more than 180 days in a taxable year, or more than 300 days in two consecutive taxable years (one of which being the taxable year for which the application is made). Ernst & Young Tax Services Limited, Hong Kong
Ernst & Young LLP, Hong Kong Tax Desk, New York
Ernst & Young LLP, Asia Pacific Business Group, New York
Document ID: 2019-5054 |