Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

May 29, 2020

Report on recent US international tax developments 29 May 2020

The United States (US) Treasury has sent final regulations on the foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) provision and the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) provision to the Office of Management and Budget Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review. The final Internal Revenue Code1 Section 250 rules were received by OIRA on 26 May. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued proposed regulations under Section 250 (REG-104464-18) in March 2019, providing guidance for calculating the deduction allowed to a domestic corporation for its FDII and GILTI. The proposed regulations primarily provide guidance for calculating a domestic corporation’s FDII; proposed regulations for calculating GILTI were released in September 2018.

Governments are ready to refocus their attention on the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 project after having been sidetracked by the global COVID-19 pandemic, according to Pascal Saint-Amans, Director of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Centre for Tax Policy and Administration. The OECD official was quoted this week as saying that there has been significant progress in regard to revenue sourcing, scope, nexus, base determination and business line segmentation, and that these areas would be the subject of future public consultation.

Saint-Amans suggested that two key trends in the BEPS area have emerged in the current environment. He said that a number of countries are beginning to believe that it is possible to ring-fence the digital economy, pointing to the fact that digital companies are doing well during the pandemic and effectively ring-fencing themselves. The US Government has been steadfast in its opposition to this point of view, arguing it is not possible to ring-fence the digital economy because the entire global economy is moving toward digitalization. The second trend, Saint-Amans reported, is that countries will not stand for tax avoidance by corporations that receive coronavirus stimulus funding.

While the OECD official said a third pillar is not being considered that would focus on a global excess profits tax as a means to raise revenue following the coronavirus pandemic, he suggested there could be a third pillar internally at the OECD that would focus on BEPS rules for lesser developed countries that may not benefit sufficiently from the original BEPS projects.


1. All “Section” references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.


For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

Ernst & Young LLP, International Tax and Transaction Services, Washington, DC



The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.


"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.


Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.

Yes, I accept         Find out more