Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

June 19, 2020

Report on recent US international tax developments 19 June 2020

In a recent letter regarding the OECD1 BEPS2 2.0 ongoing work, United States (US) Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin reportedly told other nations that talks had reached an impasse that prevented US agreement on even an interim basis, and said nations were “much closer to an agreement” on the Pillar 2 minimum tax element of the plan than Pillar 1. The work under Pillar 1 includes evaluating changes to jurisdiction to tax thresholds.

The tax deadlock spilled over to the trade sphere when the US threatened trade retaliation against countries that enacted or are considering a unilateral digital services tax (DST). In early June, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) announced it was conducting a “Section 301” investigation into adopted or proposed DSTs in 10 jurisdictions, including those of some major US trading partners such as Brazil, India, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union, among others.

During a House Ways & Means Committee trade hearing this week, USTR Bob Lighthizer reportedly said, in part, that negotiations “were not making headway on Pillar One, which is the most important pillar in there. The other people getting together and deciding they’re going to take action against the United States without our acquiescence is something that’s not acceptable.” While there’s still “room for a negotiated settlement,” Lighthizer said “the [Treasury] Secretary made the decision that rather than having them go off on their own, he would just say we’re no longer involved in the negotiations.” He gave a similar statement at the Senate Finance Committee saying the US must “show our strength.”

European officials reportedly are pushing back on the US action and vowing to proceed with DSTs if an OECD agreement proves elusive. French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire was quoted as saying he and officials from the UK, Italy and Spain had jointly responded to Secretary Mnuchin’s letter, which he labeled “a provocation towards all the partners at the OECD when we were centimeters away from a deal on the taxation of digital giants.”

The OECD responded to the recent developments, saying nations “should remain engaged in the negotiation” and indicated it will maintain its meeting schedule for all members of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS to design a multilateral approach to the digitalization of the global economy.

The OECD’s Working Party 6 and Mutual Agreement Procedure Forum earlier this month reportedly circulated a confidential questionnaire to members of the Business at OECD (BIAC) business group. The questionnaire, which was due by 17 June, was meant to determine transfer pricing compliance challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and identify issues that require guidance. The BIAC asked members to list up to five of the most pressing transfer pricing issues related to the coronavirus crisis.

The Office of Management and Budget Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) this week announced that it has completed its review of final regulations under Internal Revenue Code3 Section 250, relating to the Foreign Derived Intangible Income (FDII) provision and the Global Intangible Low-taxed Income (GILTI) provision. OIRA reported the review process as concluded on 12 June; however, this does not necessarily mean release is imminent.

Several new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) international tax projects also came over from Treasury for OIRA review this week, including a final rule on the GILTI high-tax exclusion and a related proposed rule under Section 954(b)(4) for high-taxed subpart F income and rules under Section 964 for determining a foreign corporation’s earnings and profits. OIRA this week also listed as under review final regulations under Section 163(j) and proposed rules on the limitation on the deduction for business interest expense.

A senior official in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Large Business and International Division this week provided more details with regard to the recently announced TCJA compliance campaign. The official distinguished the new TCJA campaign from others by saying it will not focus on specific transactions or issues. Rather he was quoted as saying IRS examiners would be reviewing taxpayers’ entire returns to “develop a base-level of understanding of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to bridge from where we are to where we want to be with our employees.” The campaign exams reportedly will begin soon after the IRS suspension of compliance action ends on 15 July.


1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

2. Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.

3. All “Section” references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.


For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

Ernst & Young LLP, International Tax and Transaction Services, Washington, DC



The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.


"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.


Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.

Yes, I accept         Find out more