globaltaxnews.ey.comSign up for tax alert emailsForwardPrintDownload |
22 June 2021 Kenya: Recent changes and developments to business laws and the regulatory environment The Business Laws (Amendment) (No.2) Act of 2021 (the Act) came into force on 31 March 2021. The amendments introduced by the Act are intended to support business activities in Kenya. The key statutes amended by the Act include the Law of Contract Act, Stamp Duty Act, National Social Security Fund Act (2013), National Hospital Insurance Fund, Industrial Training Act, Companies Act (2015) and the Insolvency Act. The Act has aligned the remittance dates for the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) and the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) to the due date for the remittance of Pay As You Earn (PAYE). These statutory deductions are now due by the ninth day of each month. Moreover, employers are now allowed to remit National Industrial Training Authority (NITA) payments at the end of their financial year provided the same is remitted not later than the ninth day of the month following the financial year end. However, the Act repealed the one-month delay afforded to employers for the remittance of NSSF contributions. Employers are required to remit the contributions on the prescribed date, otherwise a 5% late payment penalty accrues. The provisions of the Law of Contracts Act have now been aligned to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2015. The use of company seals is no longer mandatory in the execution of company documents.
To adopt to the new ways of doing business necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Act has now amended the Companies Act, 2015 to allow virtual and hybrid general meetings. A hybrid meeting in relation to a company’s general meeting is a meeting where some participants are in the same physical location while other participants join the meeting through electronic means including video conference, audio conference, web conference or such other electronic means. A virtual meeting in relation to a company general meeting is a meeting where all members join and participate in the meeting through electronic means. Contracts, chargeable as conveyances on sale and that attract a fixed duty of KES100 are now exempt from stamp duty.
This Act provides that an employee who adopts a child is now entitled to one month's pre-adoptive leave with full pay from the date of the placement of the child. The employee is required to give the employer a notice of at least 14 days of the intention of the adoption society to place the child in the custody of the employee. The notice shall be accompanied by documentation evidencing the intention of the adoption society to place the child in the custody of the employee and written authority by the adoption society allowing the employee to adopt. The Intellectual Property Bill, 2020, (the Bill) was published in 2020 with the aim of consolidating the existing intellectual property laws in Kenya. Currently, intellectual property in Kenya is regulated under the Kenya industrial Property Act, the Trademarks Act, the Copyright Act and the Anti-Counterfeit Act. These Acts in turn establish various governing bodies namely: the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (patents, trademarks, technology innovations and utility models), the Kenya Copyright Board (copyright administration), and the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (deals with counterfeit goods and related rights). The Bill proposes the merger of all these existing governing bodies into one institution, the Intellectual Property Office of Kenya (IPOK), to be responsible for the promotion and protection of intellectual property rights. IPOK will deal with the registration, custody and enforcement of intellectual property in Kenya. The Bill proposes that the Cabinet Secretary responsible, in consultation with stakeholders, develop a national intellectual property policy and strategy to govern the intellectual property framework in Kenya and create public awareness about economic, social and cultural benefits of intellectual property rights. The Bill proposes to establish an Intellectual Property Tribunal (the Tribunal) to have original and appellate jurisdiction over all intellectual property matters in Kenya. The Data Protection Act of 2019 was assented to by Kenya’s President on 8 November 2019 (the Act). The key highlights of this Act include:
Most recently, the Data Commissioner issued various Regulations (i.e., draft Data Protection (General) Regulations, 2021,the draft Data Protection (Compliance and Enforcement) Regulations, 2021, and the draft Data Protection (Registration of Data Controllers and Data Processors) Regulations, 2021) for public consultation. The Companies Act, 2015, now requires companies to maintain a register of their beneficial owners. Pursuant to this amendment, companies are now required to file with the Registrar a copy of their register of beneficial owners (in a prescribed form) within 30 days of its preparation. Any amendments to the register are to be filed with the Registrar within 14 days of making the amendments. The Companies (Beneficial Ownership Information) Regulations, 2020 define a beneficial owner as “the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a legal person or arrangements or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is conducted, and includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person or arrangement.” The Regulations further identify a beneficial owner as a person who meets any of the following conditions: By a notice dated 27 January 2021, the Companies Registry extended the deadline, from 31 January 2021 to 31 July 2021, for companies to prepare and file their registers of beneficial owners with the Registrar of Companies in accordance with the Regulations. On 7 August 2020, the Cabinet Secretary, Information, Communication, Technology, Innovation and Youth Affairs gazetted the National information Communication and Technology Policy Guidelines, 2020 (the Policy). A key legal requirement introduced by the Policy, is the requirement that at least 30% of the substantive ownership of ICT companies is to be held by Kenyans. This provision constituted a revision from the previous 20% substantive Kenyan equity ownership requirement for the issuance of telecommunication licences. All companies licensed by the Communications Authority were allowed a three-year period within which to meet the local equity requirements. On 25 March 2021, through another gazette notice, the Cabinet Secretary published an amendment aimed at clarifying the local ownership requirements as follows:
The Competition Tribunal in Majid Al Futtaim Hypermarkets Limited v Competition Authority of Kenya & another [2021] eKLR, issued on 20 April 2021 addressed the issue of abuse of buyer power under the Competition Act, 2010. The matter before the Tribunal was an appeal instituted by the Majid Al Futtaim Hypermarkets Limited (Majid) on the decision of the Competition Authority that required the retailer to amend various clauses of its standard supplier contract which the Authority deemed to have facilitated the abuse of power. Majid was said to have abused its “buyer power” by: transferring commercial risks to Orchards; refusing to receive Orchards’ goods for reasons which could not be ascribed to Orchards; unilaterally terminating the commercial relationship without notice and applying rebates and listing fees marked as discounts; and requiring Orchards to deploy staff as its own cost. Section 24(2B) of the Act stipulates that the Authority, in determining buyer power, must take into consideration the nature and determination of contract terms; the payment requested for access to infrastructure; and the price paid to suppliers. Buyer power is defined by the Act as “the influence exerted by an undertaking or group of undertakings in the position of a purchaser of a product or service to obtain from a supplier more favourable terms, or to impose a long-term opportunity cost including harm or withheld benefit which, if carried out, would significantly be disproportionate to any resulting long-term cost to the undertaking or group of undertakings.” The Tribunal in finding that Majid abused its buyer power stated that “the influence of power of the buyer becomes evident when the buyer engages in the offending conduct” and therefore, “by engaging in conduct which amounts to abuse of buyer power, there’s buyer power.” This case is expected to set precedence in the enforcement of “buyer power” abuse not only in Kenya but also in other African countries where the issue has not been determined judicially.
Document ID: 2021-5698 |
