Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

April 1, 2022

Report on recent US international tax developments 1 April 2022

The Biden Administration released the United States (US) FY2023 Budget on 28 March, including major tax proposals some of which were previously floated by the Administration or congressional Democrats and others that are new. Treasury also released the General Explanation (Green Book), available here. The Budget folds most of the House-passed Build Back Better Act (BBBA) into the baseline and assumes it has been enacted.

The Budget continues to call for tax provisions that fell out of the House-passed BBBA due to opposition in Congress, including raising the corporate tax rate to 28% and increasing the top marginal income tax rate (to 39.6%) for high earners, among other provisions.

The Budget includes seven proposals that focus on reforming business and international taxation that are estimated to raise US$1.628 trillion over 10 years.

The Budget proposal to increase the 21% corporate rate to 28% would consequently increase the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) rate in tandem. The corporate and GILTI rate increases would apply to tax years beginning after 31 December 2022. For an earlier tax year ending after 31 December 2022, a blended corporate rate would apply equal to 21% plus 7% multiplied by the portion of the tax year that takes place in the 2023 calendar year.

Another Administration proposal would repeal the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT), as modified by the BBBA, and replace it with an undertaxed payment rule (UTPR) that is consistent with the UTPR described in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Pillar Two Model Rules, including a global annual revenue threshold (US$850 million), de minimis exclusions and allocation among jurisdictions. Further, a US domestic minimum top-up tax would be part of the rules to protect US revenues from the imposition of UTPR by other countries. The proposal to repeal the BEAT and replace it with the UTPR would be effective for tax years beginning after 31 December 2023.

A proposal for a new incentive to bring jobs to the US would provide a new general business credit. It would equal 10% of the eligible expenses paid or incurred in connection with onshoring a US trade or business that is linked to reducing or eliminating a trade or business or line of business currently conducted outside the US or starting up, expanding, or otherwise moving the same trade or business within the US, to the extent that this action results in an increase in US jobs. The proposal would be effective for expenses paid or incurred after the date of enactment.

Other budget proposals to reform business and international taxation include:

  • Disallowing stepped-up basis of a partnership's non-distributed property to a related partner until the property is disposed. The proposal would be effective for partnership tax years beginning after 31 December 2022.

  • Conforming the definition of control to test the ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power and at least 80% of the total value of a corporation's stock. The proposal would be effective for transactions occurring after 31 December 2022.

  • Permit taxpayers to retroactively elect, in certain circumstances, to treat a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) as a qualified electing fund without Internal Revenue Service consent, generally applicable upon the date of enactment.

  • Require Internal Revenue CodeSection 6038 reporting for each foreign "taxable unit" to facilitate the BBBA's proposals for country-by-country GILTI and foreign tax credit rules, applicable beginning after 31 December 2022, and to annual accounting periods of foreign business entities ending with or within those tax years.

A Global Tax Alert provides details on these and other budget proposals.

The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 29 March approved the long-delayed US-Chile income tax treaty. The proposed treaty next goes to the full Senate which must give its advice and consent to ratification. The Chilean Government in 2015 undertook the steps necessary for the treaty to be approved in Chile. The treaty will enter into force when all applicable approval procedures in the United States and Chile have been satisfied. The Foreign Relations Committee approval was subject to two reservations concerning the BEAT and Article 23 (Relief from Double Taxation). The reservation concerning BEAT clarifies that the treaty shall not prevent the imposition of BEAT under Section 59A.

No date has been set for full Senate action.

The OECD expects to hold a public consultation on the crypto-asset reporting framework by the end of May after the close of a public consultation on 20 April. The plan, according to an OECD official this week, would be to finalize work on the framework by this fall in time for an October 2022 G-20 leaders’ summit.


For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), International Tax and Transaction Services, Washington, DC



  1. All “Section” references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.


"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.


Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.

Yes, I accept         Find out more