Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

October 26, 2022
2022-6025

Bulgarian Government proposes VAT bad debt relief

  • A draft bill for amendments to the Bulgarian Value Added Tax (VAT) Act has been circulated for public consultation. One of the key proposed changes introduces VAT recovery on unpaid receivables.

  • In particular, according to the proposal, the VAT position of the supplier should be adjusted through the issuance of a credit note. The published texts, if enacted, would govern the requirements and conditions for the application of the bad debt relief.

Background

The proposed introduction of bad debt relief in the Bulgarian legislation is a natural continuation of the administrative and court practice evolving on the topic over the past two years.

It started with the case UniCredit Leasing (C-242/18) submitted to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) by EY Bulgaria’s tax controversy team. The questions raised requested clarity on the possibility to enforce rights conferred to taxpayers by European Union (EU) law in the absence of local rules to recover VAT on bad debts. As anticipated, the CJEU confirmed the possibility for an adjustment of output VAT in the case of non-payment of receivables even where the local legislation did not provide specific rules to allow such adjustment. The CJEU was clear that the EU Member States could not revoke the right to recover VAT on bad debts, they are allowed only to provide the requirements and conditions for such recovery.

Although the UniCredit Leasing’s case was not the first request for a preliminary ruling before the CJEU on the topic, it was the first one from a country without legislation allowing the relief.

Bulgarian tax authorities' response following the UniCredit Leasing’s decision

As expected, once the CJEU’s decision on the UniCredit Leasing’s case was issued, requests for VAT refunds related to unpaid receivables began to be filed with the Bulgarian tax authorities.

The tax authorities rejected these claims based on different arguments, such as on procedural grounds, due to the lack of explicit legislative regulation of the topic, or claiming that a credit note should be issued, etc. As a result, in many cases such requests for bad debt reliefs were denied.

The proposed legislation

Given the above, the introduction of the bad debt relief in the local Bulgarian legislation is a positive development. Adoption of the proposed amendments is expected to limit the refusal of the tax authorities to grant refunds. However, it is likely that the controversies would shift to the proof that the receivable is non-collectable and in general to the compatibility of the requirements for allowing the VAT adjustment in accordance with the EU VAT law and principles.

_________________________________________

For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

Ernst & Young Bulgaria EOOD, Sofia

 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.

 


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or ey.com. Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.


Yes, I accept         Find out more