Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

May 25, 2023

IRS officials highlight latest transfer pricing developments

  • In a conference on May 18, 2023, an IRS official indicated that the IRS is planning to increase its focus on transfer pricing with the help of new hires and enhanced data analytics.
  • Another official said that the IRS is committed to handling complex cases through the Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement Program (APMA).
  • As a result, taxpayers should keep aware of new developments and be diligent in their transfer pricing methodology.

At the 12th Annual Pacific Rim Tax Conference on May 18, 2023, IRS officials highlighted three transfer pricing developments. First, the IRS is bolstering transfer pricing enforcement through increased staff and data analytics. Second, the IRS will accept unspecified methods when they lead to a reliable result. Third, the IRS supports Amount B under Pillar One of the two-pillar plan of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The officials also confirmed that the Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement Program (APMA) will still accept complicated cases in its Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) program.

Bolstering transfer pricing focus with new funding1

Jennifer Best, the Acting Deputy Commissioner at the IRS's Large Business and International (LB&I) division, stated that the agency is planning to increase its focus on transfer pricing by recruiting and training specialized staff and enhancing data analytics. Best added that transfer pricing aligns with the IRS's goals of strengthening enforcement on large corporations, as outlined in its strategic operating plan, released on April 5, 2023. Best expressed the agency's intention to expand its transfer pricing work in the future. This initiative is part of the $80 billion in additional funding granted to the IRS by Congress last year through the Inflation Reduction Act (see Tax Alert 2023--0710).

According to Best, the IRS aims to enhance its ability to identify transfer pricing noncompliance among taxpayers with improved information technology tools and "external assistance." She acknowledged, however, that this task is challenging due to the requirement for in-depth analysis of tax returns.

The success of the IRS's efforts to enhance tax certainty also relies on its ability to hire, train and retain expert staff to handle these programs effectively, Best said. The IRS's strategic operating plan emphasizes the expansion of tax certainty and issue resolution programs, enabling taxpayers to address potential compliance issues proactively through expanded pre-filing and tax certainty initiatives. Best said that the IRS is evaluating existing programs such as the Compliance Assurance Process, APAs and the pre-filing agreement program to identify areas for improvement and expansion. Some of these programs had previously been limited due to resource constraints, she added.

Accepting unspecified methods that produce reliable results2

During the conference, Best was asked about the transfer pricing functions of LB&I and its openness to unspecified transfer pricing methods. According to a conference participant, there has been considerable discussion among tax commentators about unspecified methods since the Tax Court's opinion in Medtronic Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2022-84.

Best stated that a specified method is the preferred choice in most cases. She acknowledged, however, that using an unspecified method can be effective if it aligns with regulations and produces the most reliable result.

Supporting the OECD's Amount B3

Best also reaffirmed the IRS's support for the Amount B tax simplification rules under Pillar One of the OECD's two-pillar plan. She described the proposed Amount B rules as a valuable tool for developing countries with limited expertise and experience in transfer pricing, as well as limited access to relevant data for conducting thorough comparability searches.

David Bradbury, Deputy Director of the OECD's Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, discussed the Amount A profit reallocation rules, acknowledging that unresolved issues remain despite progress on the rules' technical aspects. Bradbury said three milestones need to be achieved: concluding negotiations with a finalized text, which is expected to occur by July; executing a multilateral convention, the timing of which will depend on domestic consultation, legislative procedures and administrative processes; and ratifying Amount A.

Bradbury noted that "the fate of Amount A lies in the hands of the negotiating jurisdictions." Regardless of the outcome, he said, the fact that numerous countries have embraced principles that expand the international tax framework into previously uncharted territories is a significant development, making it unlikely that the world will return to its previous state.

APMA still accepting complicated cases4

According to Nicole Welch, acting Director of the IRS Treaty & Transfer Pricing Operations Practice Area, who spoke at the same conference, the IRS does not want or intend to avoid dealing with complex transactions in the APA program. On the contrary, the IRS is committed to handling complex transactions through the APMA, she said.

In an April memo, the IRS outlined a more discerning approach to APAs, which would focus resources on cases with higher chances of success based on criteria such as transaction complexity and past experiences with other governments. According to the memo, APMA will now engage in a rigorous two-step review of APA requests — the first at the prefiling stage and the second after an APA submission is filed. At each step, APMA may decline a taxpayer's APA request and recommend that the taxpayer apply to the International Compliance Assurance Program (ICAP) or indicate that the issues are better suited to be handled in an audit — joint or domestic. The intention is to optimize efficiency and concentrate efforts (see Tax Alert 2023--0800).

According to Welch, the guidance does not imply that all complex transactions are suitable for joint audits, although joint audits may sometimes offer a faster resolution depending on the treaty partner. The interim guidance will be incorporated into the Internal Revenue Manual after a two-year monitoring period, during which adjustments can be made based on outcomes. Welch said she hopes that people will embrace this new process and appreciate its benefits.


In light of these recent statements by IRS officials, it is important for taxpayers to recognize that the IRS's policies and procedures on transfer pricing are changing rapidly and focusing on more effective enforcement efforts. The transfer pricing landscape is evolving not only in the wake of the IRS strategic operating plan but also the OECD's Amount B work. Taxpayers must be diligent in their transfer pricing practices, selection of methodology and substantiation of their practices in intercompany agreements and documentation.


Contact Information
For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:
National Tax Department, International Tax and Transactions Services, Transfer Pricing
   • Ryan J. Kelly, Americas ITTS Tax Controversy Leader (
   • Hiro Furuya (
   • Ameet Kapoor (
   • Carlos M. Mallo (
   • Marla McClure (
   • Donna McComber (
   • Mike McDonald (
   • Tom Ralph (
   • Craig Sharon (
   • Kent Stackhouse (
   • Thomas A. Vidano (
   • Heather Gorman (
   • Giulia Di Stefano (
   • Carolina Figueroa (
   • Mitch Gibson (

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Andrea Ben-Yosef, legal editor



1 Isabel Gottlieb, IRS to Boost Transfer Pricing Focus With Some of Its New Funding, Daily Tax Report (May 18, 2023).

2 Amanda Athanasiou, IRS Funds Will Aid Transfer Pricing and APA Program, Official Says, Tax Notes Today (May 22, 2023).

3 Id.

4 Isabel Gottlieb, Complex Cases Will Still Be Accepted for APAs, IRS Official Says, Daily Tax Report (May 18, 2023).


The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.


"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.


Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.

Yes, I accept         Find out more