Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

June 9, 2023

U.S.-Chile tax treaty advances toward ratification

  • The U.S. Senate Foreign Affairs Committee voted out of committee the proposed Double Taxation Agreement between Chile and the U.S.
  • The next step is for U.S. Senate to give its advice and consent to ratification of the Treaty.
  • Once approved, Chile would become the third Latin American country with a Double Tax Treaty with the U.S.

On 1 June 2023, the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) voted out of committee (20-1) the proposed U.S.-Chile Double Taxation Agreement (Treaty).

The Treaty includes two reservations and two declarations. Text of the resolution of advice and consent to ratification can be found here.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) stated that ratifying the Treaty is crucial for access to critical minerals such as lithium. Senate Schumer has also indicated that getting it done is a priority.

Once the Senate takes the next step to give its advice and consent to the Treaty, the President must sign the ratification instruments to complete the approval and ratification process in the U.S. The Treaty would enter into force when all applicable approval procedures in the U.S. and Chile have been satisfied.


A prior edition of the Treaty was signed on 4 February 2010 (along with a Protocol) and was reported on favorably by the SFRC in 2014, 2015 and again in March 2022.

As in 2022, the SFRC's 2023 approval is subject to two reservations concerning the Base Erosion and Anti-abuse Tax (BEAT) and Article 23 (Relief from Double Taxation). The reservation concerning BEAT clarifies that (i) the Treaty shall not prevent the imposition of BEAT under U.S. Internal Revenue Code Section 59A and (ii) paragraph 1 of Article 23 of the prior Treaty would be deleted and replaced with the following:

1. In accordance with the provisions and subject to the limitations of the law of the United States (as it may be amended from time to time without changing the general principle thereof):

  1. the United States shall allow to a resident or citizen of the United States as a credit against the United States tax on income applicable to residents and citizens the income tax paid or accrued to Chile by or on behalf of such citizen or resident. For the purposes of this subparagraph, the taxes referred to in subparagraph b) of paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of Article 2 (Taxes Covered), excluding taxes on capital, shall be considered income taxes; and
  2. in the case of a United States company owning at least 10% of the aggregate vote or value of the shares of a company that is a resident of Chile and from which the United States company receives dividends, the United States shall allow a deduction in the amount of such dividends in computing the taxable income of the United States company.

Treaty provisions

Significant provisions of the Treaty from a Chilean perspective would:

  • Reduce withholding tax (WHT) rates on interest payments from Chile (i.e., from 35% to either 4%, 10% or 15%)
  • Reduce WHT rates on royalties paid from Chile (i.e., from 30% to either 2% or 10%)
  • Reduce Chilean capital gains tax rate in certain cases (i.e., from 35% to 16%); the tax Treaty may eventually protect U.S. residents from Chilean indirect transfer tax applicability
  • Eliminate WHT on the payment of services, if certain conditions are met and business is not conducted through a permanent establishment (PE) in the country
  • Not affect Chilean dividend WHT on dividends paid from Chile to the U.S. ("Chile clause" within protocol)
  • Include a limitation-on-benefits provision that includes a "headquarters company test" and a triangular provision
  • Include provisions for exchange of information between the U.S. and Chilean tax authorities
  • Include rules that source interest and royalty income to the residence of the payor or, alternatively, if the payor has a PE in connection with which the liability to pay interest or royalties was incurred, then to the location of the PE
  • Provide a place-of-use test for sourcing royalty income in cases where the residence of the payor and the PE rules described previously do not apply
  • Facilitate and eliminate some uncertainties on the foreign tax credit systems for the taxes paid
  • From a transfer pricing perspective:
    • Enable requesting a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) if a taxpayer is subject to taxation inconsistent with the tax treaty (e.g., double taxation) on adjustments derived from transfer pricing
    • Make it possible to sign Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) between both jurisdictions (i.e., bilateral APAs)

If the Treaty is ratified, the withholding provisions would become effective for amounts paid or credited on or after the first day of the second month following the date on which the Treaty enters into force. For all other taxes, the provisions would take effect for tax periods beginning on or after the first day of January following the date the Treaty enters into force.


For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

EY Chile, Santiago

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Washington

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Latin American Business Center, New York

Ernst & Young LLP (United Kingdom), Latin American Business Center, London

Ernst & Young Tax Co., Latin American Business Center, Japan & Asia Pacific

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor


The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.


"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.


Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.

Yes, I accept         Find out more