Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

January 17, 2023
2023-5049

EY Global Tax Controversy Flash Newsletter (Issue 54) | EU importers face customs valuation uncertainty and risk

Traders importing goods into the European Union (EU) are facing increased scrutiny around customs valuation — with uncertain treatments and recent court cases making this an area of increased risk for disputes, assessments and penalties.

One hot topic is the interplay of transfer pricing adjustments and customs valuation for related party transactions. Key questions include: 

  • Should later transfer pricing adjustments be taken into account retroactively in adjusting customs values?

  • Should upwards and downwards pricing adjustments be treated in the same way?

  • What is the correct basis for valuing goods for customs purposes at the time of importation if they may be subject to a transfer pricing adjustment later? 

It was anticipated that the recent judgment in the Hamamatsu case,1 would have helped to settle these questions. However, the legal reasoning of the judgment largely offers room for interpretation rather than definitive answers. 

The German court ruled that a downward adjustment of transfer prices does not entitle the company to claim a refund of import duties. However, the outcome is unclear as to whether upward price adjustments should also be ignored for customs valuation purposes. This is a crucial point, and one where importers and the Member States’ customs authorities may differ in their views. The court’s reasonings also cast doubt on the use of the transaction value method as an acceptable method for valuing goods at importation if they may be subject to later transfer pricing changes — but does not provide definitive guidance.

To date, the EU has not issued further guidance on these issues. And, in practice, individual Member States may interpret the rules differently — leading to more confusion. So, the risk of customs audits and disputes around these issues remains. EU importers should review their customs valuation policies in the light of this case and consider the possible impact of any pricing adjustments on their previous declarations. 

Read more on this topic in the latest issues of EY's TradeWatch magazine.

Additional information and links to past newsletters can be found in the attached PDF.

Flash Newsletter attachment (Issue 54)

__________________________________

Endnotes

1. Hamamatsu — a long journey about to end? (page 63)

Poland: Transfer pricing adjustments and their impact on VAT, excise and customs duties” (page 66) and “Technical Committee on Customs Valuation approves new advisory opinions on ancillary charges” (page 3)

 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.

 


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or ey.com. Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.


Yes, I accept         Find out more