Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

February 16, 2023
2023-5201

US Tax Court approves agreement by Eaton Corporation and the IRS resolving APA cancellation case

On 3 February 2023, the United States (US) Tax Court issued a stipulation approving an agreement between Eaton Corp. (Eaton) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to adjust Eaton's tax bill for 2005 and 2006 to US$8.81 million.2 The proposal follows lengthy litigation in both the Tax Court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The case originated with Eaton's inadvertent errors in calculating its transfer pricing methodology for its Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) annual reports in 2005 and 2006 (see EY Tax Alert 2022-1334 for an in-depth history). The IRS used these inadvertent errors to justify cancelling Eaton's APAs and proposing a $75 million adjustment plus $51 million in Internal Revenue Code Section 6662 penalties.

The Tax Court held that the IRS was not authorized to cancel Eaton's APAs and rejected the IRS's assertion of penalties. The IRS appealed the Tax Court's decision to the Sixth Circuit, but the appeals court ruled in favor of Eaton, finding that the IRS had the burden of proving that it had grounds to cancel the APAs under contract-law principles and failed to do so. In November 2022, Chief Judge Kerrigan ordered Eaton and the IRS to submit a proposed decision on or before 20 January 2023.3 The proposed decision determined deficiencies of $4.7 million in 2005 and $4.6 million in 2006, with no penalties. On 3 February 2023, Chief Judge Kerrigan issued a stipulated order identical to the proposed decision, which also took into account overpayments of tax for each year to result in the final $8.8 million adjustment.4

Implications

Taxpayers should pay attention to how the IRS revises Revenue Procedure 2015-41 (which provides guidance on requesting and obtaining APAs) while keeping in mind that every dispute concerning an APA depends on the facts of the particular case. The IRS rarely cancels APAs,5 and taxpayers can often resolve mistakes in an APA annual report while keeping the APA intact. The IRS has indicated that it intends to rewrite Revenue Procedure 2015-41 in light of the Sixth Circuit's ruling in Eaton, although no timeline has been given on when the revised revenue procedure will be released.6 Until new guidance is released, APAs are binding under contract-law principles, and the IRS has the burden of proving the grounds supporting an APA cancellation.

_________________________________

For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following:

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), National Tax Department, International Tax and Transaction Services, Transfer Pricing

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Andrea Ben-Yosef, legal editor

_________________________________

Endnotes

  1. Currency references in this Alert are to the US$.

  2. Alexander F. Peter, U.S. Tax Court Issues $8.8 Million Stipulated Decision in Eaton, Tax Notes (February 9, 2023).

  3. Eaton Corp. & Subs. v. Commissioner, No. 5576-12 (T.C. 22 November 2022).

  4. Peter, U.S. Tax Court Issues $8.8 Million Stipulated Decision in Eaton.

  5. Between 1991 and 2021, the IRS executed 2,191 APAs; only 11 APAs were cancelled or revoked during that same time period (2021 APMA Statutory Report, IRS (22 March 2022)).

  6. Alexander F. Peter, Eaton Defeat Prompts IRS to Rewrite Underlying APA Guidance, Tax Notes (17 October 2022).

 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct