Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

January 11, 2024
2024-0180

Hong Kong Court rules sub-licensing income is Hong Kong-sourced taxable income

  • Hong Kong's Court of First Instance (CFI) recently handed down a decision1 that ruled royalties from sub-licensing certain trademarks for use in Japan to be Hong Kong-sourced income and taxable in Hong Kong.
  • Activities performed by agents in Japan under the joint venture arrangement are not attributable to the Hong Kong taxpayer when determining its source of profits if they are not directly linked to the profit-producing activities of the taxpayer.
 

The taxpayer was incorporated in Hong Kong by its UK parent company. The UK parent company owns certain trademarks and licensed them under a master license to the taxpayer for exploitation. Meanwhile the taxpayer entered into an agreement with a joint venture partner (JV Partner) and appointed the JV Partner as its agent to arrange sub-licensing of the trademarks for use in Japan. The royalty income from Japanese companies would be shared between the taxpayer and the JV Partner on a 40:60 basis.

Hong Kong taxation is on a territorial basis, whereby the source of sub-licensing income would generally be determined according to where the taxpayer obtained the rights and granted the sub-licensing rights. The CFI held that the taxpayer's 40% share of royalty income is Hong Kong-sourced and subject to Hong Kong profits tax, on the basis that: (i) the activities of the JV Partner in Japan are not carried out on behalf of the taxpayer and therefore cannot be attributed to the taxpayer in determining the source of its income; and (ii) the joint venture agreement and the sub-license agreements for Japan were signed by the taxpayer's director in Hong Kong.

The taxpayer also received an upfront payment for granting the JV Partner the right to participate in the management of the business of the design, manufacture, distribution and sale of certain products under the trademarks in Japan. Considering the facts of the case, the CFI held that the upfront payment arose in the ordinary conduct of the taxpayer's business to exploit its right under the master license instead of giving up any asset or transferring any risk. As such, the income does not constitute non-taxable capital receipts and therefore is taxable in Hong Kong as ordinary business income.

* * * * * * * * * *

ENDNOTE

1 Patrick Cox Asia Limited v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2023] HKCFI 2676.

* * * * * * * * * *
Contact Information

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

Ernst & Young Tax Services Limited, Hong Kong

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Hong Kong Tax Desk, New York

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Asia Pacific Business Group, New York

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Asia Pacific Business Group, Chicago

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor
 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct