Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

March 22, 2024

Report on recent US international tax developments 22 March 2024

Congressional leaders and the White House this week reached a deal on the final set of full-year government funding bills, therefore presumably avoiding a partial government shutdown. In the meantime, Senate consideration of the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act (H.R. 7024) business tax and Child Tax Credit (CTC) expansion bill remains in limbo, as Congress moves toward the two-week Spring recess.

The tax bill appears unlikely to be attached to appropriations legislation, though it still could come up as a standalone bill or with other must-pass legislation. Senate Finance Committee Democrats and Republicans have traded offers to modify the CTC provisions, to no avail.

A Treasury official was quoted as saying proposed regulations on the 1% stock buyback excise tax will be released in the next several weeks. The package of proposed rules reportedly is in the final stages of review. Recall that President Biden's proposed FY 2025 Budget has called for quadrupling the stock buyback tax to 4%.

Eagerly anticipated proposed regulations on the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) reportedly may be months away from release, although they could also be released sooner. According to a Treasury official, the proposed CAMT package will address mark-to-market adjustments for unrealized gains and losses and will include a "relatively straightforward" safe harbor for periods both before and after the regulations' release.

An IRS official recently reiterated that mandatory binding arbitration remains US tax treaty policy. Mandatory binding arbitration is included in the 2016 US model tax treaty and the bilateral US income tax treaties with Belgium, Canada, Croatia (pending), France, Germany, Japan, Spain and Switzerland. Mutual agreement procedure (MAP) disputes can be brought to an arbitration panel if the parties agree to arbitration and fulfill certain requirements.

Mandatory arbitration in MAP is final-offer arbitration, meaning that each party puts forth its final position and the arbitration panel chooses one position. The successful party in arbitration is generally the one that submits the more reasonable offer. Arbitration therefore can help to more efficiently reach a MAP settlement because the parties might be more willing to negotiate before arbitration to avoid an all-or-nothing settlement.

A Treasury official this week was quoted as saying the US is "working to protect the benefits of the research credit under the [BEPS 2.0] Pillar 2 global minimum tax, possibly through OECD administrative guidance." According to the official, the US is working to identify a "range of potential fixes." Speaking at a Washington tax conference, the Treasury official said the immediate goal for the US is to address the issue through administrative guidance. If that fails, he said, "we'll go to plan B."

* * * * * * * * * *
Contact Information

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), International Tax and Transaction Services, Washington, DC

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.


"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.


Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.

Yes, I accept         Find out more