Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

June 28, 2024
2024-1291

Report on recent US international tax developments 28 June 2024

The US Supreme Court today, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, No. 22-451 (U.S. June 28, 2024), held that federal law does not require federal courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions, overturning the 40-year precedent in Chevron U.S.A. Inc v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. In a 6-3 ruling, the Court held that federal courts must "exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, as the APA requires."

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts said that Chevron was "a judicial invention that required judges to disregard their statutory duties" and the precedent's presumption that statutory ambiguities are implicitly delegated to agencies could not be squared with the APA's requirement that courts decide all relevant questions of law.

The Court's ruling applies to all agency decisions, including those of the IRS and Treasury Department.

The leader of the House Ways and Means Committee's Republican Tax Team on global competitiveness, one of the 10 groups established by House Republican leadership to address the TCJA tax cliffs, this week said the group will hold its first field meeting with stakeholders on 8 August. Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK) said the global competitiveness team will issue a White Paper with recommendations sometime after the meeting and then wait until the November elections before further action.

He also reiterated Republican concerns regarding the BEPS 2.0 project and the need for congressional input, suggesting there are Democrats in Congress who are also wary of the global tax deal.

An IRS official this week was quoted as saying the government is working on a notice of proposed rule-making that will address the application of the dual consolidated loss (DCL) income allocation rules in the context of BEPS Pillar Two global minimum tax jurisdictional tax blending. The IRS released Notice 2023-80 in December 2023, with guidance on the interaction of the foreign tax credit and DCL rules with top-up taxes imposed via an Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) or a Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) under the global anti-base erosion (GloBE) Rules. The 2023 notice indicated that the Treasury Department and the IRS were studying the extent to which the GloBE Rules should trigger application of the DCL rules, including whether the GloBE Rules' jurisdictional-blending approach should result in a "foreign use" of a DCL.

The US and Switzerland signed a new FATCA Model 1 agreement on 27 June, according to a press release issued by the Swiss government. The new Model 1 agreement will replace an existing Model 2 agreement and is "expected to apply from 2027."

US Treasury and OECD officials offered insights this week on various issues related to the BEPS 2.0 Pillar One and Pillar Two project. Speaking at the annual OECD/US Council for International Business meeting in Washington, US Treasury officials continued to insist that Pillar One Amount B must be mandatory and linked to Amount A. Amount B is meant to simplify and streamline the application of the arm's-length principle to in-country baseline and marketing and distribution activities. According to a senior Treasury official, an optional version of Amount B is understandable as part of an initial phased approach, but Pillar One tax certainty ultimately will require Amount B to apply broadly and without optionality.

Another Treasury official said that, from the US perspective, the primary deliverables for Pillar One are the removal of digital services taxes in response to Amount A and the mandatory application of Amount B.

Although a majority of Inclusive Framework jurisdictions are in agreement regarding Amount B pricing rules and ranges, a Treasury official indicated a small number of countries contend that application of Amount B will not result in an arm's-length price within their countries. This, the official said, has caused the delay in reaching consensus on mandatory application of Amount B.

An OECD official at the conference also was quoted as saying the organization is finalizing a framework for the exchange of Pillar Two GloBE information returns (GIRs) among tax administrations that in-scope taxpayers will be required to file. The GIR is intended to contain the information that tax administrations will need to perform a risk assessment and to evaluate the correctness of a Constituent Entity's Top-up Tax liability under the GloBE Rules. A template for GloBE information returns was released in July 2023. (For details on the conference, see this Global Tax Alert.)

* * * * * * * * * *
Contact Information

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), International Tax and Transaction Services, Washington, DC

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor
 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.

 


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or ey.com. Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.


Yes, I accept         Find out more