Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

September 5, 2024
2024-1642

Brazilian Federal Revenue Service publishes public consultation regarding proposed transfer pricing regulations applicable to intragroup services and advance pricing arrangements

  • The proposed regulations intend to restrict the mark up applicable to intermediation services.
  • The proposed regulations include further details on the benefit tests.
  • Besides dealing with transfer pricing matters related to services, the rules also cover the application of the withholding tax on intermediation services.
  • A completely new set of regulations are proposed for advance pricing agreements (APAs), with some limitations being proposed that had not been anticipated in former publications by the tax authorities.
 

On 28 August 2024, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service (RFB) published a public consultation to collect comments and suggestions on the proposed regulations to implement the transfer pricing legislation (Law No. 14.596/23) related to (1) transactions involving intragroup services and (2) APAs.

Taxpayers may submit comments by email until 30 September 2024 and may request meetings with the RFB to discuss the matter.

Intragroup services

Under the proposed regulations, the RFB would modify the intragroup services provisions of Normative Instruction 2,161, from September 2023 (IN 2,161/23).

Specifically, the proposed regulations would clarify the rules for analyzing transactions involving services that are focused on intermediation of tangible and intangible goods. The proposed regulations would not allow taxpayers to claim more than one deduction for the same service (embedded fees), even when the values of the services are integrated into operations involving tangible or intangible goods. They also would include a provision on the concept of incidental benefits (including benefits arising from a partner's activity), which would not be included in a taxpayer's compensation. Additionally, the proposed regulations would include a test to determine the economic and commercial benefits of the services provided.

For intermediated services, the proposed regulations would clarify the determination of charging at cost (without adding a profit margin) for services provided by third parties. According to the proposed text, the costs related to the performance of services by a related party could be remunerated with a profit margin, but the portion of the services provided by third parties and allocable to Brazil could not be marked up.

Additionally, for services that include the use of tangible goods, the RFB proposes that Brazilian withholding tax (IRRF, for the Brazilian acronym) would be levied only on the service portion (and not on the part of the fees related to the intermediated goods/tangible goods).

APAs

The RFB proposes a new normative instruction that would detail the entire APA process in Brazil. As suggested by the RFB's own text, the APA process would be a voluntary process aimed at offering predictability and legal certainty to taxpayers. The text of the proposed normative instruction would clarify that the APA process would allow a cooperative process between the RFB and the taxpayer to prevent disputes over the methodology and economic analysis of controlled operations conducted by Brazilian companies.

While the RFB had expressed in other publications and public events that it preferred bilateral APAs, the proposed regulations deal only with unilateral APAs. Unilateral APAs could be an issue, to the extent double taxation could occur, given there would not be an agreement between Brazil and the authorities of other jurisdictions involved.

According to the proposed regulations, the RFB would be authorized to determine the maximum number of APAs to be accepted for analysis per year, due to the limitation of resources and specialized personnel. The proposed regulations also would only make the APA process available to companies that have already been participants in the cooperative tax compliance program (CONFIA) for at least six months.

The RFB would present its conclusions on the APA and the taxpayer would have the opportunity to discuss and propose adjustments. If the RFB and taxpayer do not agree, the RFB would then prepare a document detailing the reasons the agreement was unfeasible. The taxpayer would not have the right to appeal or request a reconsideration of the RFB's decisions.

The APA would be valid for up to four years and could be extended for another two years. The proposed regulations would allow the APA to be applied to previous assessment periods, if the facts apply and the RFB authorizes it.

The proposed regulations would not include information on the protection against a tax audit or the application of penalties during the APA request analysis process.

Implications

Stakeholders should submit comments to share their views and participate in the drafting of the transfer pricing rules in Brazil.

Taxpayers also should consider the proposed regulations when conducting their transactions, whether current or future. Although the proposed regulations are subject to comments and changes, they are a potential indicator of what the RFB is focused on with respect to the provision of services between related parties and the APA process.

* * * * * * * * * *
Contact Information

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

EY Assessoria Empresarial Ltda, São Paulo

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Latin American Business Center, New York

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor
 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.

 


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or ey.com. Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.


Yes, I accept         Find out more