Sign up for tax alert emails    GTNU homepage    Tax newsroom    Email document    Print document    Download document

September 20, 2024
2024-1738

OECD releases outcomes of seventh peer review on BEPS Action 13 on CbCR

  • The OECD has released the outcomes of the seventh annual peer review of jurisdictions' implementation of country-by-country reporting requirements.
  • More than 115 jurisdictions around the world have country-by-country reporting rules in place and 93 jurisdictions have multilateral or bilateral competent authority agreements for the exchange of such reports.
  • Companies should expect the information provided in the country-by-country reports they file with one tax authority to be shared with other tax authorities and should be prepared for the use of these reports for other purposes, including for purposes of the global minimum tax rules of Pillar Two.
 

Executive summary

On 16 September 2024, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published the compilation of the outcomes of the seventh annual peer review (the Compilation) of the minimum standard on Action 13 (Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting) of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project. The Compilation covers 138 jurisdictions and confirms that jurisdictions' implementation of country-by-country (CbC) reporting (CbCR) is largely consistent with the Action 13 minimum standard.

According to the OECD press release, more than 115 jurisdictions have introduced legislation to impose a CbCR obligation on multinational entity (MNE) groups, applicable to almost all MNE groups with consolidated group revenue at or above the threshold of €750m. Additional Inclusive Framework member jurisdictions are working toward finalizing their domestic legal frameworks with the support of the OECD. Where legislation is in place, the implementation of CbCR has been found largely consistent with the Action 13 minimum standard. More than 3,300 bilateral relationships for the exchange of CbC reports are now in place.

The BEPS Action 13 peer review is an annual process, with the next peer review report to be released in the third quarter of 2025.

Detailed discussion

Background

In October 2015, the OECD released the final reports on all 15 BEPS Action Plan focus areas.1 Action 13 establishes CbCR requirements as a minimum standard subject to peer review. On 1 February 2017, the OECD released terms of reference for the peer review on the implementation of BEPS Action 13 on CbCR,2 including the items to be reviewed in three key areas: (i) the domestic legal and administrative framework; (ii) the exchange of information framework; and (iii) the confidentiality and appropriate use of CbC reports.

The peer review process takes a staged approach, which is intended to allow for the early detection of inconsistencies with the minimum standard and provide jurisdictions with an opportunity to address those inconsistencies. During phase one of the peer review, the review focused on the domestic legal and administrative framework and certain aspects of confidentiality. During phase two, the review focused on the exchange of information framework and appropriate use. For phase three and onward, the review has covered all three key aspects of jurisdictions' implementation.

On 23 May 2018, the OECD released the first compilation of annual peer reviews, reflecting the review of 95 jurisdictions that provided legislation or information pertaining to their implementation of CbCR.3 The second compilation of annual peer reviews, covering a total of 116 jurisdictions, was released on 3 September 2019.4 This was followed by: the third, covering a total of 131 jurisdictions, released on 24 September 2020;5 the fourth, covering a total of 132 jurisdictions, released on 18 October 2021;6 the fifth, covering a total of 134 jurisdictions, released on 4 October 2022;7 and the sixth, covering a total of 136 jurisdictions, released on 25 September 2023.8

Seventh annual peer review report on CbCR

On 16 September 2024, the OECD published the Compilation of the outcomes of the seventh annual peer review of the minimum standard on Action 13. The Compilation reflects a finding that jurisdictions' implementation of CbCR has been largely consistent with the Action 13 minimum standard. The report on each jurisdiction generally reflects its implementation status as of 31 March 2024, with the information on the exchange of CbC reports reflecting the exchange status as of 31 December 2023.

According to the executive summary accompanying the Compilation, the seventh annual peer review covers the 138 jurisdictions that provided legislation and/or other information relating to their implementation of CbCR, which involves almost all MNE groups with consolidated group revenue of at least €750m. Some Inclusive Framework member jurisdictions were not included in the peer review, either because they joined the Inclusive Framework after 1 October 2023 (at which point it was too late to incorporate them into this peer review) or because they opted out of peer review in accordance with the peer review terms of reference.9 Jurisdictions opting out of peer review must confirm that they do not have any resident entities that are the Ultimate Parent Entity of an MNE group with revenue meeting the consolidated revenue threshold and will not require local filing of CbC reports. Each jurisdiction reviewed received its own report, all of which together make up the Compilation.

Legislation implementing CbCR is in place in more than 115 jurisdictions. In the review, 19 jurisdictions received a general recommendation to put in place or finalize their domestic legal or administrative framework for CbCR,10 and 37 jurisdictions received one or more recommendations for improvements to specific areas of their CbCR framework. In total, 60 jurisdictions received at least one recommendation from the seventh peer review or still have a recommendation outstanding from a previous peer review.11

The Compilation further reports that 93 jurisdictions have multilateral or bilateral competent authority agreements in place, resulting in more than 3,300 exchange-of-information relationships. Of the jurisdictions included in this peer review, 99 have undergone an assessment by the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes concerning confidentiality and data safeguards in implementing the automatic exchange-of-information standard and did not receive any action plan in this regard. As it contains nonpublic information on jurisdictions' internal systems and procedures, the outcomes of that assessment are not published, and the Compilation provides no further details of the confidentiality review.

In addition, 84 jurisdictions have provided detailed information about the appropriate use of CbC reports, enabling the Inclusive Framework to obtain sufficient assurance that the jurisdictions have measures in place to ensure the CbC reports' appropriate use.

Work will continue to monitor the implementation and operation of CbCR by member jurisdictions of the Inclusive Framework and the progress that jurisdictions make in addressing any recommendations they have received. The next peer review report will be released in the third quarter 2025.

Implications

The Compilation highlights the widespread implementation of CbCR requirements and the increased sharing of tax and financial data among tax authorities as a result. Companies should expect that information provided to one tax authority through the filing of a CbC report will be shared with other relevant jurisdictions. In addition, plans for future deployment of OECD risk assessment tools, together with many tax authorities' existing use of CbCR data analytics, underscores the need for companies to be confident that their data governance approach is sufficient to meet current and future demands. Moreover, CbC reports are central to several ongoing global projects, including the OECD/G20 BEPS 2.0 project and the Pillar Two Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour in particular.

* * * * * * * * * *

Endnotes

1 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases final reports on BEPS Action Plan, dated 6 October 2015.

2 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases peer review documents on BEPS Action 5 on Harmful Tax Practices and on BEPS Action 13 on Country-by-Country Reporting, dated 6 February 2017.

3 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases first annual peer review report (Phase 1) on Action 13, dated 29 May 2018.

4 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases outcomes of the second phase of peer reviews on BEPS Action 13 and announces public consultation, dated 9 September 2019.

5 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases outcomes of third phase of peer reviews on BEPS Action 13, dated 29 September 2020.

6 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases outcomes of fourth phase of peer reviews on BEPS Action 13, dated 25 October 2021.

7 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases outcomes of fifth peer review on BEPS Action 13 and updates CbCR guidance, dated 4 November 2022.

8 See EY Global Tax Alert, OECD releases outcomes of sixth peer review on BEPS Action 13 on country-by-country reporting, dated 6 October 2023.

9 Belarus, Cook Islands, Fiji, Kuwait, Moldova, Philippines, Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Samoa. Although Belarus and the Russian Federation have not been included in the 2024 peer review process, a copy of the Russian Federation's peer review report for 2021 and a copy of Belarus's report for 2022 are included in the Compilation for information.

10 Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Belarus, Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Eswatini, Grenada, Haiti, Jamaica, Liberia, Namibia, North Macedonia, Paraguay, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sierra Leone and Uzbekistan.

11 Albania, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Belarus, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, China (People's Republic of), Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Eswatini, Faroe Islands, France, Gabon, Georgia, Greenland, Grenada, Haiti, Honduras, India, Israel, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Liberia, Mauritania, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Namibia, North Macedonia (Republic of), Pakistan, Papua New Guinea. Paraguay, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam and Zambia.

* * * * * * * * * *
Contact Information

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

Ernst & Young Belastingadviseurs LLP, Rotterdam

Ernst & Young Belastingadviseurs LLP, Amsterdam

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Global Tax Desk Network, New York

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Washington, DC

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor
 
 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.

 

Copyright © 2024, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Any U.S. tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

 

"EY" refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

 

Privacy  |  Cookies  |  BCR  |  Legal  |  Global Code of Conduct Opt out of all email from EY Global Limited.

 


Cookie Settings

This site uses cookies to provide you with a personalized browsing experience and allows us to understand more about you. More information on the cookies we use can be found here. By clicking 'Yes, I accept' you agree and consent to our use of cookies. More information on what these cookies are and how we use them, including how you can manage them, is outlined in our Privacy Notice. Please note that your decision to decline the use of cookies is limited to this site only, and not in relation to other EY sites or ey.com. Please refer to the privacy notice/policy on these sites for more information.


Yes, I accept         Find out more